The Nairobi High Court has issued a temporary injunction restraining Sonko from publishing or sharing any defamatory content against Miguna.
The directive follows concerns raised over statements allegedly made by the former governor on social media, particularly on his Facebook page, where he has been actively engaging his followers on political and personal matters.
In the order, Justice Mulwa made it clear that the matter is now before the court and must be handled through the legal process.
“Let the pleadings and motion be served upon the respondent,” the judge directed, signaling the beginning of formal proceedings between the two high-profile figures.
The ruling effectively silences Sonko, at least for now, from making further remarks that could be deemed harmful to Miguna’s reputation.
This comes amid growing scrutiny over how public figures use social media platforms, especially when addressing sensitive disputes that may cross into defamation.
The development has sparked reactions online, with many Kenyans taking to Facebook to discuss the court’s decision.
The latest post circulating on the platform highlights the court’s intervention, with users sharing mixed opinions on whether the move protects reputations or limits free expression.
Supporters of Miguna argue that the court’s action is necessary to uphold accountability and prevent the spread of damaging claims. On the other hand, some of Sonko’s followers believe the outspoken politician is being unfairly restricted from expressing his views.
As the case unfolds, all eyes will be on how both parties present their arguments in court. For now, the High Court’s order remains in place, setting the stage for what could become a closely watched legal showdown
0 Comments