What Happened to His Party? Concerns as Moses Kuria Declares Bid to Vie for MP Seat on Ruto's UDA

Former Cabinet Secretary and Chama Cha Kazi party leader Moses Kuria’s decision to declare interest in contesting the Gatundu South Member of Parliament seat on a United Democratic Alliance (UDA) ticket has triggered mixed reactions among Kenyans, with many questioning the future and relevance of his party.

Kuria’s move, which he announced through his social media platforms, immediately ignited debate online, with supporters and critics weighing in on what they described as a politically significant shift.

While some viewed the decision as a strategic realignment ahead of the 2027 General Election, others raised concerns about leadership consistency and party loyalty.

A dominant question emerging from the public discourse is the fate of Chama Cha Kazi aspirants who have been preparing to vie for various seats under the party’s banner.

Several Kenyans wondered what direction such aspirants should now take, arguing that the party leader’s choice to seek elective office under another party sends conflicting signals.

“You are a party leader yet you can’t even vie on your own party. You think going with UDA will make things better for you,” one commenter wrote, reflecting sentiments shared widely across social media platforms.

Others described the move as unprecedented, with one reaction stating, “A party leader registering to vie for an MP seat on another political party,” a statement that captured the confusion expressed by sections of the public.

The criticism was particularly sharp from those who believe Kuria’s decision effectively weakens Chama Cha Kazi as an independent political vehicle.

Some commentators went as far as claiming that the party had been politically absorbed by UDA, with one viral reaction reading, “Chama Cha Kazi imemezwa na UDA. This is the highest level of simping.”

However, political observers note that party hopping and strategic alliances are not new in Kenyan politics, especially as influential politicians position themselves within dominant parties ahead of elections.

From this perspective, Kuria’s move is seen by some as a pragmatic attempt to remain electorally competitive in a region where UDA commands significant grassroots support.

Despite the backlash, Kuria has not publicly addressed the concerns raised about the future of Chama Cha Kazi or clarified how his decision affects party aspirants.

As debate continues, attention is expected to shift to whether Chama Cha Kazi will field candidates independently in 2027 or increasingly align itself with the ruling party.